CompaniesLumentum

Thesis

  • The business: own III-V fab capacity with enough scale, sell merchant chips in addition to finished module.
  • Moat:
    • Owned InP wafer fabs.
    • Merchant laser-chip position, EML qualification with hyperscalers and Nvidia.
    • 3-year take-or-ay customer agreements offsetting planned capex.
  • Barriers for the industry: InP epitaxy capacity and yield. Substrate access. Hyperscaler qualification.
  • Growth drivers:
    • Networking has become a bottleneck with computing power growing on a faster curve.
  • Competition:
    • In module assembly: China (Innolight and Eoptolink) make 70% of the transceivers sold into the U.S.
    • In 200G EMLs, Lumentum and Broadcom.
    • In high-power CPO lasers, Coherent.
    • In OCS, Lumentum is the only merchant shipping at $100m a quarter, while its largest customer keeps an internal version.
  • Risks:
    • Two customers are 41.6% of revenue.
    • Architecture: silicon photonics and CPO cut laser content per port.
    • Factory utilization works both ways on margin.
    • Competition from Coherent and Broadcom.
    • Industry-wide capacity expansion landing in 2028 to 2029.
    • China substrate restrictions + U.S. export control risk.
    • The convertible overhang competing with capacity ramp.
    • Disclosure moving backward.
Lumentum versus Coherent
  • Lumentum is the better engine at the top of the cycle. Coherent is an average engine with a wider floor.
  • The duel is Coherent's module scale against Lumentum's chip scarcity.
  • Lumentum is one of the two merchant laser chip seller (with Broadcom), with a smaller cost base, higher pricing power, higher margins (through mix tilt to component) and less China competition. It is also ahead in OCS and CPO shipment.
  • Lumentum's exposure is operating leverage on a concentrated customer base.
  • Moat: Coherent's moat is process scale consumed internally; Lumentum's is design and process at the scarce layer, sold to everyone. Lumentum monetizes its moat in price; Coherent in volume and security of supply.
  • Customers: Lumentum has more price power per unit and more buyer concentration; Coherent has broader, longer-dated cover. A single hyperscaler's build plan is a fixed-cost event for Lumentum and a revenue wobble for Coherent.
  • Suppliers: Coherent's integration buys continuity; Lumentum buys flexibility and lighter commitments ($2.35bn). In a supply shock Coherent keeps shipping; in a demand shock Lumentum has less to unwind.

Reports

Built with LogoFlowershow